Social enterprise — Blog — Apply Point Admissions Consulting

The Financial Times recently shined a light on the relative lack of meaningful data on business schools’ social impact initiatives. Without such data, they report, it is difficult for the schools to analyze, benchmark, and improve upon their efforts. Still, the Times acknowledges signs of progress in current aggregated reporting efforts. These may help move the business school community towards a more focused discussion on the outcomes of sustainability and social impact initiatives.

Two organizations, Responsible Research for Business and Management (RRBM) and the United Nations Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME) have taken a lead in calling upon business schools to update their curriculums to equip future leaders to take on climate change, inequality, and other societal and environmental challenges, reports the Times. The RRBM and others, including the Financial Times itself, have recently led competitions that highlight strong individual examples of ESG courses and research. The PMRE requests regular reports from members, although the responses are not easily measurable or comparable between schools.

In September 2022, the Association to Advance the Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB), a nonprofit organization that provides trustworthy accreditation, published its first outcomes-based report on business schools’ initiatives mapped to the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals for 2030. The AACSB noted that just 74 schools, predominantly in the U.S. and the U.K., submitted reports, and few went beyond describing activities. Most submitted initiatives focused on quality education, decent work and economic growth, and gender equality. The AACSB described the report to the Financial Times by saying, “Schools are quite immature in their societal impact plans. Most…are just figuring out the areas in which they want to concentrate their efforts.” They continued, “[They] need to progress beyond a list of service activities.”

In contrast to other countries, in the U.K. all universities must provide case studies and research papers to demonstrate their actions and impact to the Research Excellence Framework (REF), reports the Times. The REF then provides an external assessment of each submission and assigns a grade to the universities based on the “originality, significance, and [rigor]” of the initiatives. However, critics of the REF note that the time and resources used for reporting social impact might be better spent on pursuing social impact.

As we blogged in January, environmental and social conscientiousness is indeed becoming a bigger part of business school curriculums. This is necessary in part because corporations themselves value these things more and more, and students must understand the modern work culture. "Profit, equity, sustainability, and inclusion must co-exist," Federico Frattini, dean at MIP Politecnico di Milano told BusinessBecause. New reports bolster the importance of schools addressing social issues on campus too, lowering their carbon footprint and caring for students' mental health.

BusinessBecause interviewed 17 business school deans about the key trends they expected would influence business education in 2022. The deans noted that, among other trends, climate change and social issues will play an important role in the future of MBA education. Specifically, they pointed to the need for schools to update their curriculums to better reflect businesses’ expanding views on creating value and the importance of considering their own operational sustainability.

Srikant Datar took over the leadership of Harvard Business School in January 2021, mid-way through the academic year, and in the midst of the covid pandemic. Rather than derailing his vision, the pandemic, with its emphasis on technology and hybrid learning formats, has actually expedited it. “COVID is the passage to the school’s future. Without any doubt, it has been an extremely exciting and rewarding year,” he said.

Datar spent a considerable amount of time seeking input from the HBS community when building his agenda. He spoke with every faculty member and facilitated individual and small group meetings with alumni, students, staff, and others to understand their goals and perspectives. Datar then defined three “aspirations” for the school, “...stretching HBS and its learners beyond notions of merely personal success toward becoming, collectively and individually, driving forces in redefining the role of business in society around the world—addressing inequality, exclusion, climate change, and other intractable problems. Second, directing HBS’s research to action, ensuring that the leaders it trains or influences change practices and engage human differences to enhance the constructive role of capitalism. And, finally, the school must transform learning, extend its reach, and work with its students throughout their careers.”

Datar also named the “engines” that would make these aspirations possible: recruiting a diverse array of talent and enabling their success, undergoing a digital transformation for education delivery and the HBS “research infrastructure”, and “expanding and deepening ties” to the greater University, particularly into the humanities.

To activate the aspirations, Datar announced that Harvard Business School will be creating two institutes, one focused on business and society, and the other on digital and technology. These institutes will provide a structure that facilitates faculty interactions, student engagement with research efforts and new technologies, and space for alumni and businesses to access, train and collaborate using the latest research.

The Institute for the Study of Business in Global Society, which will be led by Debora L. Spar, will house the following activities:

HBS’s academic partnership with OneTen, an organization dedicated to advocating for black individuals who do not have an undergraduate degree, but wish to use skills and knowledge to obtain “family-sustaining careers”
Climate change research and the promotion of carbon neutral goals by considering alternative accounting metrics
Economic development within mid-American cities harmed most by de-industrialization; researching promising engines to spur business and economic growth
Social Enterprise research and the development of new models to enhance impact

The second institute, currently labeled “D3,” will be led by Karim R. Lakhani and focus on digital and technology, data science, artificial intelligence and machine learning, and design thinking. Clustering the topics together will optimize research efforts and maximize the impact for HBS and business overall.

While the HBS priorities are centered on two key pillars, business and society, and data and technology, Datar says he considers these components two parts of a whole. “When I think about the challenges we’re talking about,” Datar said, alluding to both the school and society writ large, “every time we have talked about technology on one side of the coin, on the other side is humanities and people. Any time you let those two get out of synch, the opportunity for division arises, and with it, economic harm. Leadership at the core means always thinking about impact on people, and on what you are trying to achieve through an organization.”

Read the full interview between Srikant Datar and the Harvard Magazine here.

Your story set apart.